AI training for your team: start with five answers that hold up The team, documentation and answers below are fictional examples authored for this article. This is a proposed exercise, not a model test result. The worksheet is original PraktickAI editorial guidance, not Anthropic curriculum, a credential or an offer of a partner service. A completed brief: five FAQ answers Task and inputs: Draft five FAQ answers from a fictional app’s public help documentation. Allowed inputs: material suitable for public release and five invented questions. No customer records, accounts or internal data. Manual baseline: An author finds the source passage, writes an answer and submits it for review. Before the exercise, do this for the same five questions and record writing and review time. The baseline has not yet been measured. Accountability: Jana, support lead, owns the brief and any decision about further use. Petr prepares drafts. Eva, documentation owner, independently checks evidence. These names and roles are fictional. Evidence for each answer: Question, draft, exact source passage, document title, section and version date. For real public documentation, include a working URL. Flag missing information instead of guessing. Acceptance and human review: Eva accepts all five only after confirming that every claim matches its source and preserves its conditions. Return unsupported answers for correction. Five fluent texts alone do not pass. Action boundary: Drafts remain inside the exercise. No automatic replies, publication or account changes. Accepting an exercise does not authorize sending an answer to a customer. Measurement: One exercise within five working days; the same five questions and source version. Record preparation time, review time, returned drafts and accepted answers. No results exist yet. Stop condition: Stop the exercise if an input is non-public. If a source is missing or contradictory, stop that answer and hand the question to Jana; do not guess. Handover: Petr submits the five-answer table, source passages, review notes and measurement log. Jana decides whether to revise, repeat or end the exercise. The sentence that makes an answer pass or fail Invented help documentation, version 1, “Export” section: “Choose Export in Settings. Export is available on the Pro plan.” Question: “Can I export on the free plan?” This is an authored illustration of review, not actual model output. “Yes, export is free for everyone.” — Reject. The source specifies Pro; it does not support the claim about the free plan. “The help documentation lists export on Pro. This passage does not establish availability on the free plan.” — Accept for the exercise after checking the passage. The answer separates supported information from an unknown. Adapt the brief to one workflow TASK AND ALLOWED INPUTS: ... MANUAL BASELINE AND MEASUREMENT: ... OWNER / AUTHOR / REVIEWER: ... OUTPUT AND EVIDENCE FOR EACH CLAIM: ... ACCEPTANCE RULE: ... WHAT THE REVIEWER MUST REJECT: ... ACTION BOUNDARY (what is not sent/published): ... MEASUREMENT WINDOW AND METRICS: ... STOP CONDITION AND HANDOVER CONTACT: ... HANDOVER PACKAGE AND NEXT DECISION: ...