A second look at your PR with AI comments.
PraktickAI PR Review adds a summary and any inline comments to support human review. It does not approve or merge.
Available now: request praktickai[bot] as a reviewer. It reviews the diff within size limits; large files may be omitted. Rule-based auto-approval is only planned.
GitHub App · diff and PR context are sent to an external AI provider through OpenRouter
Bump lint config & format 12 files
+38 −38 · 3 files · @dana · opened 40s ago
- Review requestpraktickai[bot]
- Scopebounded diff
- ProcessingOpenRouter
- Decisionhuman
Good PRs sit in a queue waiting for a rubber stamp.
Dependency, formatting and copy changes also need review. AI comments can add another view; your team remains responsible for validation and merge.
On request
a bot review request triggers the review
Diff
large files may be omitted
Human
decides on approval and merge
See what each review costs you today — and with our AI.
This model compares human review cost with an illustrative AI cost. It excludes remaining human review and is not a price quote or measured saving.
Illustrative calculation from your inputs. The AI amount is not a binding price; human review remains necessary and its remaining cost is excluded here.
Each human review
9€
Each PR Review (AI)
0.06€
Human review — monthly
3,500€
100 reviewer-hours
PraktickAI — monthly
24€
usage-based, no seats
Hypothetical cost difference
3,476€
≈ 41,712€ a year · 100 human-review hours in this model, not proven savings
Request a reviewer. Get the review.
The app reads the diff through GitHub and sends it with PR context to an external AI provider through OpenRouter. It posts the result as a comment review on the PR.
01 · INSTALL
Install the app
Install the app on selected repositories and link the installation to your console organization.
02 · REQUEST
Ask the bot to review
On any pull request, request praktickai[bot] as a reviewer — exactly the way you would ask a colleague. Nothing runs until you do.
03 · REVIEW
Read the comments
Read the summary and any inline comments. Check them alongside tests; AI may miss issues or suggest an incorrect change.
Next: you define what "safe enough to auto-approve" means.
Plain toggles and patterns, versioned in your repo as .praktickai/pr-review.yml. Not shipped yet — this is what we are building on top of the review you can install today.
All required checks pass
CI, tests, and status checks are green
Only allowed paths changed
docs/** · **/*.md · *.lock
Diff under size limit
≤ 150 changed lines, ≤ 8 files
Author is trusted
team member or allowlisted bot (Dependabot, Renovate)
Post an approval review
satisfies branch protection
Auto-merge when green
squash · delete branch · optional
Require a second human on Fridays
schedule-aware overrides
Escalate everything else
request review from CODEOWNERS
Human review remains part of every PR.
The available bot posts comment reviews only. Automatic approval, merge and rules in the preceding roadmap example are not implemented. AI output is not a safety guarantee.
Approval stays with a person
The bot does not issue an approval review or merge.
Check tests yourself
Comments do not replace CI or branch protection. The bot does not decide based on CI status.
Review scope is bounded
The diff has a size limit; omitted files need separate review.
Processing outside GitHub
An external AI provider processes the diff and PR context through OpenRouter. Check your code-sharing policy before use.
Put it on one repository and see what it catches.
Install the app, pick a single repository, and request the bot on your next pull request. If the review is not worth reading, disconnect it in one click.
Early access. You are billed per review — see the calculator above for what that costs.
Ready to start?
Start a free course or explore training options for your team.
Beginner courses are free. Team training includes workshops, custom programs, and consulting.