Auto-approve the pull requests that don't need you.
Code review is the bottleneck. PraktickAI PR Review approves the safe, routine changes on rules you set — and sends the risky ones to a human.
Available now: request praktickai[bot] as a reviewer and get an AI review of the whole diff. Auto-approval on your own rules is what we are building next.
Installs as a GitHub App · your code never leaves GitHub
Bump lint config & format 12 files
+38 −38 · 3 files · @dana · opened 40s ago
- CI & tests passing14/14
- Diff within size limit< 150 lines
- No protected paths touchedclean
- Trusted author@dana
Good PRs sit in a queue waiting for a rubber stamp.
Half of what you merge is low-risk: dependency bumps, formatting, copy, config, generated files. It still waits hours for a click. That wait is a tax on the whole team's velocity — and a real payroll cost.
~50%
of PRs are low-risk, routine changes
6h+
typical wait for a first review
< 1 min
to approve once PR Review signs off
See what each review costs you today — and with our AI.
Every human review is paid engineering time. Drag the sliders to your team's numbers; we'll estimate what PR Review would cost for the same volume.
"Loaded cost" = salary + overhead per engineering hour. The AI figure is an estimate — a small fixed fee per pull request. Adjust the sliders to your team.
Each human review
9€
Each PR Review (AI)
0.06€
Human review — monthly
3,500€
100 reviewer-hours
PraktickAI — monthly
24€
usage-based, no seats
You get back
3,476€
≈ 41,712€ a year · 100 reviewer-hours returned to shipping every month
Request a reviewer. Get the review.
No pipeline to configure and no code to copy anywhere. The app reads the diff through GitHub and answers on the pull request.
01 · INSTALL
Install the app
Add PraktickAI to your GitHub organization and pick the repositories it may read. Two clicks, no keys to manage.
02 · REQUEST
Ask the bot to review
On any pull request, request praktickai[bot] as a reviewer — exactly the way you would ask a colleague. Nothing runs until you do.
03 · REVIEW
Read the comments
Inline comments land on the diff — bugs, security issues, performance traps — with the reasoning next to the line it applies to.
Next: you define what "safe enough to auto-approve" means.
Plain toggles and patterns, versioned in your repo as .praktickai/pr-review.yml. Not shipped yet — this is what we are building on top of the review you can install today.
All required checks pass
CI, tests, and status checks are green
Only allowed paths changed
docs/** · **/*.md · *.lock
Diff under size limit
≤ 150 changed lines, ≤ 8 files
Author is trusted
team member or allowlisted bot (Dependabot, Renovate)
Post an approval review
satisfies branch protection
Auto-merge when green
squash · delete branch · optional
Require a second human on Fridays
schedule-aware overrides
Escalate everything else
request review from CODEOWNERS
The point isn't approving everything — only what's provably safe.
PR Review refuses to auto-approve anything that touches what matters, no matter what the other rules say. These guardrails can't be toggled off by accident.
Sensitive paths always escalate
auth, migrations, CI config, infra, secrets, payment code — hard-blocked
Any failing or missing check stops it
no green CI, no approval — full stop
Never approves its own config change
edits to the rules file always need a human
Every decision is auditable
who, what, which rule, what it cost — exported, reversible with one click
Put it on one repository and see what it catches.
Install the app, pick a single repository, and request the bot on your next pull request. If the review is not worth reading, disconnect it in one click.
Early access. You are billed per review — see the calculator above for what that costs.
Ready to start?
Start a free course or explore training options for your team.
Beginner courses are free. Team training includes workshops, custom programs, and consulting.